The latest instalment of the Battersea Poltergeist investigation is now live, and sees some shocking behaviour in the 1950s – and links to an even older case…

Why should one case being exposed as a fraud mean that all such cases are also fraudulent? Generalised judgements encompassing everything that has ever gone bump in the night do not ring true in each and every case. Maybe some are charlatans, maybe some are ghosts. Why does it have to be all or nothing?

Click here to read Claire Smith’s full analysis, and for our earlier coverage click here.

Posted on 0 By PS News Posted in News Tagged #
PS's avatar

PS

Leave a comment